Dead Poets Society, 1989 // Movie Review

Here goes my first review!

This is a movie about a group of boys in an elite prep school who are trying to fulfill their parents’ high expectations when a new English professor teaches them to question the status quo and inspires them to embrace life with passion, poetry, and individuality. The boys form the secret Dead Poets Society, in which they read poetry in a cave by night while also trying to accomplish their own dreams by day, with positive and negative consequences.



I watched this movie twice several months ago and it instigated so much thoughts and conclusions (thereby falling into a love-hate relationship with the story) that I decided to write up a review/analysis.

Let me know what you think! 🙂

/ Trailer /

/ Tech Specs /

Directed by Peter Weir (Witness, The Truman Show, Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World, The Way Back)

Script by Tom Schulman

Starring Robin Williams, Robert Sean Leonard, Ethan Hawke

Genre: American Drama, Period, Coming-of-age

Industry Content Rating: PG

Awards: The BAFTA Award for Best Film, the César Award for Best Foreign Film, and the David di Donatello Award for Best Foreign Film. The scriptwriter Tom Schulman received an Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay. (According to

/ Storyline /

Painfully shy Todd Anderson has been sent to the school where his popular older brother was valedictorian. His roommate, Neil Perry, although exceedingly bright and popular, is very much under the thumb of his overbearing father. The two, along with their other friends, meet Professor Keating, their new English teacher, who tells them of the Dead Poets Society, and encourages them to go against the status quo. Each does so in his own way, and is changed for life.

(Quoted from From

/ Positives /

The setting.

Retro 1959. Boarding school. And bagpipes. (I have a weakness for bagpipes and all things Scottish.)

The characters (especially Neil, Professor Keating, and Todd) and acting.

The camaraderie among the schoolboys is very close and all the more touching when their unity is shocked by Neil’s decision. And in contrast to the boys’ friendship and formation of the Dead Poets Society, they each feel and try to balance the pressure placed upon them by the school and their parents/family – another thing I can closely relate to.

I also love the contrast shown between Neil (the charismatic and bold one) and Todd (the quiet/introvert/rule-follower), yet they still are able to become friends.

Really have to give it up to all the actors to bring these characters to life from the script. It’s impossible to not love Neil (and to not swallow back tears) when I finished.

A fresh perspective of life (and English Lit) via Carpe Diem, which is also one of the major downfalls of this story. Since it’s presented as Truth when reality it’s a Partial Truth. Only living out Carpe Diem/Romanticism without good sense and solid standards to live by leads to down to the mire, from which some literally never come out alive. However, on the positive side, I like Professor Keating’s emphasis of individuality, nonconformity, and the whole “think for yourself and not just out of the textbook commentary” concept.

A poetic paraphrase from Shakespeare.

The literary quotations/references.

Although I’m not well read in terms of Whitman and Thoreau, I appreciate all the literary recitations/quotations in the film. They are all very well delivered by the characters and serves to strengthen the Romanticism theme Professor Keating advocates for his students to live by. And there really are quite a few worthy original quotations from this script.

/ Negatives /

The largest issue I have with this movie is the lack of clarity as to the actual moral of the story, which means this story requires a lot of analysis on the audience’s part.

**(Spoilers until “Conclusion” section)**

While I identify the main theme as pro-Romanticism (Professor Keating teaching his students that we live and die so life should be lived and viewed as extraordinary and worth living, but nothing is really discussed about after death, which is SO important), Neil’s suicide in the end ironically comes across to me as saying “look, this is the ultimate end of this kind of mentality.”

I do realize that another (and rather valid) interpretation may be that the rigid conservatism of Neil’s parents and Welton Academy led Neil to do what he did. I think it’s very likely he would not have shot himself after performing the play if 1) his father realizes that his boy has talent and instead encourage it or maybe set a contingency that he must be able to support himself with a living while pursuing the art, or 2) Neil talks to his father about his despair and expresses how much he feels he needs to act. The fact that Neil refused to openly communicate, perhaps because he “knows” his father will refuse lead me to conclude this story promotes a sort of liberal education agenda along the veins of “parents should let their teens follow their dreams/feelings/whatever they may be without holding them back.” I completely disagree with this type of education of children (since when did YA ever know what’s really good for them?), since teens need a lot of proper guidance and wisdom, though this should be balanced by love and open communication.


DEAD POETS SOCIETY is a very well-acted movie with some important points all teens/YA/students should think about – including independent thinking, youth rebellion, parental expectations vs. peer pressure vs. personal dreams, and the balance between wisdom and passion. It presents a very realistic portrait of the young adult struggles in the search for meaning and a hopeful future. (Should you pursue your own dreams or the dreams your mentors have laid out for you?) This story’s emotional appeal cannot be denied.

However, the film’s incomplete presentation of truth makes it difficult for me to give this a whole-hearted five star rating. There are some wonderful but unfulfilled opportunities here for the filmmakers to communicate a message about the meaning of life and also how to live passionately (Carpte Diem) and wisely. Perhaps they were attempting to communicate a positive message via negative example, but it’s one of those stories you have to think about because the answer is not given straightforwardly. My take: All heart and no head can likely lead to ultimately Despair and Death, due to lack of wisdom/logic, recklessness, depression/anxiety, hopelessness. All head and no heart can likely lead to a view that life is mundane and ordinary and without passion. I would recommend watching this only in cases where older teens/YA can discuss this story with one’s parents/mentors.

Powerful quote. I think Keating failed to emphasize caution and wisdom to his students… either that or he just never go around to it yet.

Ratings in a Glimpse:

  • Entertainment Value: 4 of 5
  • Aesthetic Quality: 4 of 5
    • Story: 3.75 of 5
    • Characters: 4.5 of 5
    • Acting: 5 of 5
    • Visuals: 4 of 5
  • Content:
    • Sexual: Light – a few sexual references, kissing, picture of nude female briefly shown
    • Language: Light
    • Violence: Light – mostly implied
  • Morality: Depends on audience’s interpretation of film’s message/goal, which is subtle and can be taken multiple ways, 2.5 of 5 (inconsistent, vague, lacking, partial truth)
  • Recommended?
    • For older/mature teens and adults to watch with parents/mentors and discuss important, real life topics

Overall Conclusion: 3.75 of 5, Worth the time but caution strongly advised

/ Discussion Questions /

Due to possible spoilers inherent in the discussion questions, please click Page 2 to see them. I also included some additional thoughts I have related to the questions.

Thanks for reading!

Have any of you seen this film? What do you think of it and my review? I’d love to talk it over with you or hear any other comments/questions you may have. 🙂

P.S. I wish to thank Evelyn from for her timely, thoughtful, and thorough feedback on the formatting, content, and wording for this first review. They were much appreciated! 🙂

5 thoughts on “Dead Poets Society, 1989 // Movie Review

  1. Wow, I really enjoyed reading over this (even for a second time! 😉 ). I was struck again by your “love/hate relationship” with this movie and I pretty much agree. I first watched this movie when I was very young and the (no spoilers :)) outcome of one of the young student’s attempts at following the philosophy of his teacher overshadowed the other parts and utterly depressed me and I have, ever since, hated the movie. However, you have made me think back about that and to “the other parts.”

    Perhaps one day I’ll watch it again and find more than I did the first time. Or maybe I’ll be able to handle it better.

    Anyways, I very much enjoyed your review! I found it insightful and thoughtful.

    (Also I had no idea you could have multiple pages on post. 😮 Fascinating, and very clever.)

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you very much!! I do think if I watched it when I was in my younger/maybe HS days it would have felt different (less clear vision I guess). The movie encouraged me to start thinking about those themes more, which I appreciate. 🙂

      Let me know when/if you get to rewatch it and tell me if I missed anything (story-wise, analysis-wise, or just perspective-wise)!

      *bows again*

      (Yeah! I came across the Pages feature by accident 😛 inserted a page break and look what I’ve found… :D)

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I was so excited to see that you had posted your first review! Especially when I saw which movie you had chosen!
    I personally love this movie, so obviously my opinions are going to be biased here. I agree that this movie is well acted, with excellent characters, and that the morality of it is somewhat ambiguous. However, I tend to prefer movies that need this kind of analysis over the ones that hand a message to you. How I interpret it is close to what you said about Neil not being able to openly communicate with his parents, and that was what caused the tragedy. When Keating talked to Neil, he encouraged him to talk to his father about his desire to be an actor. He encouraged communication. But Neil felt like he KNEW the outcome, and he felt trapped. That is the tragedy. Not that he actually WAS trapped, but that he FELT trapped. He didn’t KNOW what would have happened if he had tried to talk to his parents. His perception led him to believe that there was only one way out, and as an audience member, you could conclude that that was what the filmmakers intended (and for all I know, maybe it was) but I just see a kid who couldn’t bring himself to stand up and truly seize the day. It’s complicated of course. And I don’t know if what I am saying actually makes sense. I agree that a lot of the themes in this movie could be taken the wrong way, but overall I enjoy it as a story and I think it is true enough to life that we can draw our own conclusions from it.
    Great review!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I think where carpe diem breaks down is when it’s in combination with our sinful natures and other baggage we are carrying. I think that what Neil did was draw a conclusion from what his teacher was saying that wasn’t what his teacher intended. What Keating did was bring to light issues that Neil already had. He didn’t create the issues. Neil had them already, they were just buried. We all have to confront our baggage at some point, and it’s not going to be pretty. All Keating did was cause Neil to face his baggage sooner than later. I don’t think it’s right to blame what happened on Keating though. When Neil got to the point where he was confronted with the choice, he made the choice himself. Based on the issues he had, it was a decision he would have to make eventually- the issues wouldn’t have just stayed buried. What he chose to do was a twisted version of what carpe diem means. That being said, teachers have a heavy responsibility. They have a huge impact on their students. That is one thing that is shown in this story. As a teacher, you have to be careful about what your students are taking away from what you teach. But I think the fact that Keating gave Neil advice and strongly encouraged him to talk to his father shows that what Keating was trying to teach and what Neil ultimately concluded were not the same thing.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s